<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>open source on Media Presser</title>
    <link>https://mediapresser.com/tags/open-source/</link>
    <description>Recent content in open source on Media Presser</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mediapresser.com/tags/open-source/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>HyperCrux Review: A Hybrid SQL, Key-Value, Graph and Vector Database Built on SQLite</title>
      <link>https://mediapresser.com/hypercrux-review-a-hybrid-sql-key-value-graph-and-vector-database-built-on-sqlite/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://mediapresser.com/hypercrux-review-a-hybrid-sql-key-value-graph-and-vector-database-built-on-sqlite/</guid>
      <description>I looked at the public repository at github.com/hypercrux/hypercrux and the project site at hypercrux.com, and examined the published architecture, API, benchmarks, testing methodology and project structure. This is a preliminary engineering assessment based on the repository documentation, not yet an independently executed source-code audit. It covers the released 0.x line; a second engine in development, the Beta, comes up further down.
My overall impression is favorable. HyperCrux has a more coherent product proposition than many experimental multimodel databases.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
