<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>dsa on Media Presser</title>
    <link>https://mediapresser.com/tags/dsa/</link>
    <description>Recent content in dsa on Media Presser</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mediapresser.com/tags/dsa/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>FCC Robot Import Ban, ChatGPT&#39;s DSA Designation, and the CMA&#39;s Microsoft 365 Probe</title>
      <link>https://mediapresser.com/fcc-robot-import-ban-chatgpts-dsa-designation-and-the-cmas-microsoft-365-probe/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://mediapresser.com/fcc-robot-import-ban-chatgpts-dsa-designation-and-the-cmas-microsoft-365-probe/</guid>
      <description>Three regulatory actions landed inside twenty-four hours, in three jurisdictions, aimed at three different problems. What they have in common is that none of them used a statute written for the technology in question.
The FCC&amp;rsquo;s ban on foreign advanced robotic devices covers any new ground-based, software-controlled wireless robot weighing more than 4.4 pounds. Because the threshold is defined by mass and locomotion rather than by capability, the rule reaches warehouse automation platforms, inspection robots, delivery machines, and consumer robot vacuums alike.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>The FCC Drew the Line at 4.4 Pounds and Caught the Robot Vacuum</title>
      <link>https://mediapresser.com/the-fcc-drew-the-line-at-4.4-pounds-and-caught-the-robot-vacuum/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://mediapresser.com/the-fcc-drew-the-line-at-4.4-pounds-and-caught-the-robot-vacuum/</guid>
      <description>I think the security case about foreign-made connected devices is real. A camera-equipped, always-on machine that maps the interior of a home and phones a server abroad is a genuine collection platform, and the people who spent a decade warning about this were not being paranoid. I&amp;rsquo;ve written that a network of them inside government buildings would be an intelligence problem worth acting on.
So I should be the natural audience for the FCC&amp;rsquo;s new rule.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
