<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Diplomacy on Media Presser</title>
    <link>https://mediapresser.com/tags/diplomacy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Diplomacy on Media Presser</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mediapresser.com/tags/diplomacy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Non-Binding Agreements Now Govern More Than Treaties Do</title>
      <link>https://mediapresser.com/non-binding-agreements-now-govern-more-than-treaties-do/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://mediapresser.com/non-binding-agreements-now-govern-more-than-treaties-do/</guid>
      <description>The serious criticism of any voluntary international framework is that it has no teeth. No enforcement, no penalties, no court. Governments sign, praise it, and go home.
The criticism is accurate and mostly beside the point, because binding treaties have become close to impossible to conclude among the states that matter, and the soft instruments that replaced them turn out to do a surprising amount of governing.
Look at what&amp;rsquo;s happened to ratification.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
